MAYBE * Step 1: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> 0() f(s(x)) -> s(f(f(p(s(x))))) p(s(x)) -> x - Signature: {f/1,p/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,p} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs f#(0()) -> c_1() f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))) p#(s(x)) -> c_3() Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 2: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(0()) -> c_1() f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))) p#(s(x)) -> c_3() - Weak TRS: f(0()) -> 0() f(s(x)) -> s(f(f(p(s(x))))) p(s(x)) -> x - Signature: {f/1,p/1,f#/1,p#/1} / {0/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/3,c_3/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#,p#} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {1,3} by application of Pre({1,3}) = {2}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: f#(0()) -> c_1() 2: f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))) 3: p#(s(x)) -> c_3() * Step 3: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))) - Weak DPs: f#(0()) -> c_1() p#(s(x)) -> c_3() - Weak TRS: f(0()) -> 0() f(s(x)) -> s(f(f(p(s(x))))) p(s(x)) -> x - Signature: {f/1,p/1,f#/1,p#/1} / {0/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/3,c_3/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#,p#} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))) -->_3 p#(s(x)) -> c_3():3 -->_2 f#(0()) -> c_1():2 -->_1 f#(0()) -> c_1():2 -->_2 f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))):1 -->_1 f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))):1 2:W:f#(0()) -> c_1() 3:W:p#(s(x)) -> c_3() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 2: f#(0()) -> c_1() 3: p#(s(x)) -> c_3() * Step 4: SimplifyRHS MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))) - Weak TRS: f(0()) -> 0() f(s(x)) -> s(f(f(p(s(x))))) p(s(x)) -> x - Signature: {f/1,p/1,f#/1,p#/1} / {0/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/3,c_3/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#,p#} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: SimplifyRHS + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))) -->_2 f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))):1 -->_1 f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x))),p#(s(x))):1 Due to missing edges in the depndency graph, the right-hand sides of following rules could be simplified: f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x)))) * Step 5: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(s(x)) -> c_2(f#(f(p(s(x)))),f#(p(s(x)))) - Weak TRS: f(0()) -> 0() f(s(x)) -> s(f(f(p(s(x))))) p(s(x)) -> x - Signature: {f/1,p/1,f#/1,p#/1} / {0/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#,p#} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE