MAYBE * Step 1: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x,empty()) -> x f(cons(a,k),y) -> f(y,k) f(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> f(cons(a,k),k) - Signature: {f/2} / {cons/2,empty/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {cons,empty} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = WIDP} + Details: We add the following weak innermost dependency pairs: Strict DPs f#(x,empty()) -> c_1() f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)) f#(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> c_3(f#(cons(a,k),k)) Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 2: UsableRules MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(x,empty()) -> c_1() f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)) f#(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> c_3(f#(cons(a,k),k)) - Strict TRS: f(x,empty()) -> x f(cons(a,k),y) -> f(y,k) f(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> f(cons(a,k),k) - Signature: {f/2,f#/2} / {cons/2,empty/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#} and constructors {cons,empty} + Applied Processor: UsableRules + Details: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: f#(x,empty()) -> c_1() f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)) f#(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> c_3(f#(cons(a,k),k)) * Step 3: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(x,empty()) -> c_1() f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)) f#(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> c_3(f#(cons(a,k),k)) - Signature: {f/2,f#/2} / {cons/2,empty/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#} and constructors {cons,empty} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {1} by application of Pre({1}) = {2,3}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: f#(x,empty()) -> c_1() 2: f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)) 3: f#(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> c_3(f#(cons(a,k),k)) * Step 4: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)) f#(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> c_3(f#(cons(a,k),k)) - Weak DPs: f#(x,empty()) -> c_1() - Signature: {f/2,f#/2} / {cons/2,empty/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#} and constructors {cons,empty} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)) -->_1 f#(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> c_3(f#(cons(a,k),k)):2 -->_1 f#(x,empty()) -> c_1():3 -->_1 f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)):1 2:S:f#(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> c_3(f#(cons(a,k),k)) -->_1 f#(x,empty()) -> c_1():3 -->_1 f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)):1 3:W:f#(x,empty()) -> c_1() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 3: f#(x,empty()) -> c_1() * Step 5: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(cons(a,k),y) -> c_2(f#(y,k)) f#(empty(),cons(a,k)) -> c_3(f#(cons(a,k),k)) - Signature: {f/2,f#/2} / {cons/2,empty/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#} and constructors {cons,empty} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE