WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: id(0()) -> 0() id(s(x)) -> s(id(x)) - Signature: {id/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {id} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation: The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(s) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {id} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = [1] p(id) = [9] p(s) = [1] x1 + [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: id(0()) = [9] > [1] = 0() Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: id(s(x)) = [9] >= [9] = s(id(x)) * Step 2: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: id(s(x)) -> s(id(x)) - Weak TRS: id(0()) -> 0() - Signature: {id/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {id} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(s) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {id} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = 0 p(id) = 2 + 8*x1 p(s) = 2 + x1 Following rules are strictly oriented: id(s(x)) = 18 + 8*x > 4 + 8*x = s(id(x)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: id(0()) = 2 >= 0 = 0() * Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: id(0()) -> 0() id(s(x)) -> s(id(x)) - Signature: {id/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {id} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))