WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: f(x){x -> g(x)} = f(g(x)) ->^+ f(x) = C[f(x) = f(x){}] ** Step 1.b:1: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear): The following argument positions are considered usable: none Following symbols are considered usable: {f} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(f) = 9 + 2*x1 p(g) = 4 + x1 Following rules are strictly oriented: f(g(X)) = 17 + 2*X > 9 + 2*X = f(X) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: ** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))