WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,s} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: f(c(x,y)){x -> s(x)} = f(c(s(x),y)) ->^+ f(c(x,s(y))) = C[f(c(x,s(y))) = f(c(x,y)){y -> s(y)}] ** Step 1.b:1: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,s} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear): The following argument positions are considered usable: none Following symbols are considered usable: {f,g} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(c) = x2 p(f) = 1 p(g) = 12 + 2*x1 p(s) = 8 + x1 Following rules are strictly oriented: g(c(x,s(y))) = 28 + 2*y > 12 + 2*y = g(c(s(x),y)) g(s(f(x))) = 30 > 14 = g(f(x)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: f(c(s(x),y)) = 1 >= 1 = f(c(x,s(y))) ** Step 1.b:2: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) - Weak TRS: g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,s} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear): The following argument positions are considered usable: none Following symbols are considered usable: {f,g} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(c) = x1 p(f) = 2 + x1 p(g) = 1 p(s) = 1 + x1 Following rules are strictly oriented: f(c(s(x),y)) = 3 + x > 2 + x = f(c(x,s(y))) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: g(c(x,s(y))) = 1 >= 1 = g(c(s(x),y)) g(s(f(x))) = 1 >= 1 = g(f(x)) ** Step 1.b:3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))