interpretations
YES(?,O(n^3))
We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
certificate YES(?,O(n^3)).
Strict Trs:
{ f(X) -> n__f(X)
, f(0()) -> cons(0(), n__f(s(0())))
, f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0())))
, p(s(X)) -> X
, activate(X) -> X
, activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) }
Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity
Answer:
YES(?,O(n^3))
The following argument positions are usable:
Uargs(f) = {1}, Uargs(cons) = {}, Uargs(n__f) = {}, Uargs(s) = {},
Uargs(p) = {}, Uargs(activate) = {}
TcT has computed following constructor-based matrix interpretation
satisfying not(EDA).
[1 2 3] [1]
[f](x1) = [0 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 0] [1]
[0]
[0] = [0]
[0]
[0 0 0] [0]
[cons](x1, x2) = [0 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 1 1] [0]
[1 1 1] [0]
[n__f](x1) = [0 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 0] [1]
[1 0 0] [0]
[s](x1) = [0 0 0] x1 + [2]
[0 1 1] [1]
[1 0 1] [0]
[p](x1) = [0 0 1] x1 + [0]
[0 0 1] [0]
[3 0 0] [3]
[activate](x1) = [0 1 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 1] [0]
This order satisfies following ordering constraints
[f(X)] = [1 2 3] [1]
[0 0 0] X + [0]
[0 0 0] [1]
> [1 1 1] [0]
[0 0 0] X + [0]
[0 0 0] [1]
= [n__f(X)]
[f(0())] = [1]
[0]
[1]
> [0]
[0]
[0]
= [cons(0(), n__f(s(0())))]
[f(s(0()))] = [8]
[0]
[1]
> [7]
[0]
[1]
= [f(p(s(0())))]
[p(s(X))] = [1 1 1] [1]
[0 1 1] X + [1]
[0 1 1] [1]
> [1 0 0] [0]
[0 1 0] X + [0]
[0 0 1] [0]
= [X]
[activate(X)] = [3 0 0] [3]
[0 1 0] X + [0]
[0 0 1] [0]
> [1 0 0] [0]
[0 1 0] X + [0]
[0 0 1] [0]
= [X]
[activate(n__f(X))] = [3 3 3] [3]
[0 0 0] X + [0]
[0 0 0] [1]
> [1 2 3] [1]
[0 0 0] X + [0]
[0 0 0] [1]
= [f(X)]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^3))
lmpo
MAYBE
We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
certificate MAYBE.
Strict Trs:
{ f(0()) -> cons(0(), n__f(s(0())))
, f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0())))
, p(s(X)) -> X
, f(X) -> n__f(X)
, activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X)
, activate(X) -> X }
Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity
Answer:
MAYBE
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
mpo
MAYBE
We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
certificate MAYBE.
Strict Trs:
{ f(0()) -> cons(0(), n__f(s(0())))
, f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0())))
, p(s(X)) -> X
, f(X) -> n__f(X)
, activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X)
, activate(X) -> X }
Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity
Answer:
MAYBE
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
popstar
MAYBE
We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
certificate MAYBE.
Strict Trs:
{ f(0()) -> cons(0(), n__f(s(0())))
, f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0())))
, p(s(X)) -> X
, f(X) -> n__f(X)
, activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X)
, activate(X) -> X }
Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity
Answer:
MAYBE
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
popstar-ps
MAYBE
We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
certificate MAYBE.
Strict Trs:
{ f(0()) -> cons(0(), n__f(s(0())))
, f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0())))
, p(s(X)) -> X
, f(X) -> n__f(X)
, activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X)
, activate(X) -> X }
Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity
Answer:
MAYBE
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..