YES(?,POLY)

We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
certificate YES(?,POLY).

Strict Trs:
  { filter(cons(X), 0(), M) -> cons(0())
  , filter(cons(X), s(N), M) -> cons(X)
  , sieve(cons(0())) -> cons(0())
  , sieve(cons(s(N))) -> cons(s(N))
  , nats(N) -> cons(N)
  , zprimes() -> sieve(nats(s(s(0())))) }
Obligation:
  innermost runtime complexity
Answer:
  YES(?,POLY)

The input was oriented with the instance of 'Polynomial Path Order'
as induced by the safe mapping

 safe(filter) = {2, 3}, safe(cons) = {1}, safe(0) = {},
 safe(s) = {1}, safe(sieve) = {1}, safe(nats) = {1},
 safe(zprimes) = {}

and precedence

 filter > sieve, filter > nats, nats > sieve, zprimes > sieve,
 zprimes > nats, filter ~ zprimes .

Following symbols are considered recursive:

 {}

The recursion depth is 0.

For your convenience, here are the satisfied ordering constraints:

     filter(cons(; X); 0(),  M) > cons(; 0())                   
                                                                
  filter(cons(; X); s(; N),  M) > cons(; X)                     
                                                                
           sieve(; cons(; 0())) > cons(; 0())                   
                                                                
        sieve(; cons(; s(; N))) > cons(; s(; N))                
                                                                
                      nats(; N) > cons(; N)                     
                                                                
                      zprimes() > sieve(; nats(; s(; s(; 0()))))
                                                                

Hurray, we answered YES(?,POLY)