Problem CSR 04 Ex15 Luc06

Tool IRC1

Execution TimeUnknown
Answer
YES(?,O(n^1))
InputCSR 04 Ex15 Luc06

stdout:

YES(?,O(n^1))

Tool IRC2

Execution TimeUnknown
Answer
YES(?,O(n^1))
InputCSR 04 Ex15 Luc06

stdout:

YES(?,O(n^1))

'Fastest (timeout of 60.0 seconds)'
-----------------------------------
Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem:    innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
  Rules: {f(f(a())) -> f(g(f(a())))}

Proof Output:    
  'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' proved the best result:
  
  Details:
  --------
    'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' succeeded with the following output:
     'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
     --------------------------------------------------------------
     Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
     Input Problem:    innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
       Rules: {f(f(a())) -> f(g(f(a())))}
     
     Proof Output:    
       The problem is match-bounded by 0.
       The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
       {  f_0(2) -> 1
        , a_0() -> 2
        , g_0(2) -> 2}

Tool RC1

Execution TimeUnknown
Answer
YES(?,O(n^1))
InputCSR 04 Ex15 Luc06

stdout:

YES(?,O(n^1))

Tool RC2

Execution TimeUnknown
Answer
YES(?,O(n^1))
InputCSR 04 Ex15 Luc06

stdout:

YES(?,O(n^1))

'Fastest (timeout of 60.0 seconds)'
-----------------------------------
Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem:    runtime-complexity with respect to
  Rules: {f(f(a())) -> f(g(f(a())))}

Proof Output:    
  'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' proved the best result:
  
  Details:
  --------
    'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' succeeded with the following output:
     'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
     --------------------------------------------------------------
     Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
     Input Problem:    runtime-complexity with respect to
       Rules: {f(f(a())) -> f(g(f(a())))}
     
     Proof Output:    
       The problem is match-bounded by 0.
       The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
       {  f_0(2) -> 1
        , a_0() -> 2
        , g_0(2) -> 2}