LMPO
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ r(xs, ys, zs, nil()) -> xs
, r(xs, nil(), zs, cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), zs), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), nil(), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), nil()), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), cons(z, zs), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(ys, cons(y, ys), zs, cons(succ(zero()), cons(w, ws)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
MPO
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ r(xs, ys, zs, nil()) -> xs
, r(xs, nil(), zs, cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), zs), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), nil(), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), nil()), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), cons(z, zs), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(ys, cons(y, ys), zs, cons(succ(zero()), cons(w, ws)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
POP*
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ r(xs, ys, zs, nil()) -> xs
, r(xs, nil(), zs, cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), zs), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), nil(), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), nil()), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), cons(z, zs), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(ys, cons(y, ys), zs, cons(succ(zero()), cons(w, ws)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
POP* (PS)
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ r(xs, ys, zs, nil()) -> xs
, r(xs, nil(), zs, cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), zs), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), nil(), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), nil()), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), cons(z, zs), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(ys, cons(y, ys), zs, cons(succ(zero()), cons(w, ws)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
Small POP*
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ r(xs, ys, zs, nil()) -> xs
, r(xs, nil(), zs, cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), zs), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), nil(), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), nil()), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), cons(z, zs), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(ys, cons(y, ys), zs, cons(succ(zero()), cons(w, ws)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
Small POP* (PS)
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ r(xs, ys, zs, nil()) -> xs
, r(xs, nil(), zs, cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), zs), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), nil(), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(xs, xs, cons(succ(zero()), nil()), ws)
, r(xs, cons(y, ys), cons(z, zs), cons(w, ws)) ->
r(ys, cons(y, ys), zs, cons(succ(zero()), cons(w, ws)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..