LMPO
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ -(x, 0()) -> x
, -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
, p(s(x)) -> x
, f(s(x), y) -> f(p(-(s(x), y)), p(-(y, s(x))))
, f(x, s(y)) -> f(p(-(x, s(y))), p(-(s(y), x)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
MPO
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ -(x, 0()) -> x
, -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
, p(s(x)) -> x
, f(s(x), y) -> f(p(-(s(x), y)), p(-(y, s(x))))
, f(x, s(y)) -> f(p(-(x, s(y))), p(-(s(y), x)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
POP*
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ -(x, 0()) -> x
, -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
, p(s(x)) -> x
, f(s(x), y) -> f(p(-(s(x), y)), p(-(y, s(x))))
, f(x, s(y)) -> f(p(-(x, s(y))), p(-(s(y), x)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
POP* (PS)
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ -(x, 0()) -> x
, -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
, p(s(x)) -> x
, f(s(x), y) -> f(p(-(s(x), y)), p(-(y, s(x))))
, f(x, s(y)) -> f(p(-(x, s(y))), p(-(s(y), x)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
Small POP*
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ -(x, 0()) -> x
, -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
, p(s(x)) -> x
, f(s(x), y) -> f(p(-(s(x), y)), p(-(y, s(x))))
, f(x, s(y)) -> f(p(-(x, s(y))), p(-(s(y), x)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
Small POP* (PS)
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ -(x, 0()) -> x
, -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y)
, p(s(x)) -> x
, f(s(x), y) -> f(p(-(s(x), y)), p(-(y, s(x))))
, f(x, s(y)) -> f(p(-(x, s(y))), p(-(s(y), x)))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..