Problem Strategy outermost added 08 Ex1 Zan97 FR

LMPO

Execution Time (secs)
0.021
Answer
MAYBE
InputStrategy outermost added 08 Ex1 Zan97 FR
MAYBE

We consider the following Problem:

  Strict Trs:
    {  g(X) -> h(activate(X))
     , c() -> d()
     , h(n__d()) -> g(n__c())
     , d() -> n__d()
     , c() -> n__c()
     , activate(n__d()) -> d()
     , activate(n__c()) -> c()
     , activate(X) -> X}
  StartTerms: basic terms
  Strategy: innermost

Certificate: MAYBE

Proof:
  The input cannot be shown compatible

Arrrr..

MPO

Execution Time (secs)
0.031
Answer
MAYBE
InputStrategy outermost added 08 Ex1 Zan97 FR
MAYBE

We consider the following Problem:

  Strict Trs:
    {  g(X) -> h(activate(X))
     , c() -> d()
     , h(n__d()) -> g(n__c())
     , d() -> n__d()
     , c() -> n__c()
     , activate(n__d()) -> d()
     , activate(n__c()) -> c()
     , activate(X) -> X}
  StartTerms: basic terms
  Strategy: innermost

Certificate: MAYBE

Proof:
  The input cannot be shown compatible

Arrrr..

POP*

Execution Time (secs)
0.033
Answer
MAYBE
InputStrategy outermost added 08 Ex1 Zan97 FR
MAYBE

We consider the following Problem:

  Strict Trs:
    {  g(X) -> h(activate(X))
     , c() -> d()
     , h(n__d()) -> g(n__c())
     , d() -> n__d()
     , c() -> n__c()
     , activate(n__d()) -> d()
     , activate(n__c()) -> c()
     , activate(X) -> X}
  StartTerms: basic terms
  Strategy: innermost

Certificate: MAYBE

Proof:
  The input cannot be shown compatible

Arrrr..

POP* (PS)

Execution Time (secs)
0.030
Answer
MAYBE
InputStrategy outermost added 08 Ex1 Zan97 FR
MAYBE

We consider the following Problem:

  Strict Trs:
    {  g(X) -> h(activate(X))
     , c() -> d()
     , h(n__d()) -> g(n__c())
     , d() -> n__d()
     , c() -> n__c()
     , activate(n__d()) -> d()
     , activate(n__c()) -> c()
     , activate(X) -> X}
  StartTerms: basic terms
  Strategy: innermost

Certificate: MAYBE

Proof:
  The input cannot be shown compatible

Arrrr..

Small POP*

Execution Time (secs)
0.037
Answer
MAYBE
InputStrategy outermost added 08 Ex1 Zan97 FR
MAYBE

We consider the following Problem:

  Strict Trs:
    {  g(X) -> h(activate(X))
     , c() -> d()
     , h(n__d()) -> g(n__c())
     , d() -> n__d()
     , c() -> n__c()
     , activate(n__d()) -> d()
     , activate(n__c()) -> c()
     , activate(X) -> X}
  StartTerms: basic terms
  Strategy: innermost

Certificate: MAYBE

Proof:
  The input cannot be shown compatible

Arrrr..

Small POP* (PS)

Execution Time (secs)
0.031
Answer
MAYBE
InputStrategy outermost added 08 Ex1 Zan97 FR
MAYBE

We consider the following Problem:

  Strict Trs:
    {  g(X) -> h(activate(X))
     , c() -> d()
     , h(n__d()) -> g(n__c())
     , d() -> n__d()
     , c() -> n__c()
     , activate(n__d()) -> d()
     , activate(n__c()) -> c()
     , activate(X) -> X}
  StartTerms: basic terms
  Strategy: innermost

Certificate: MAYBE

Proof:
  The input cannot be shown compatible

Arrrr..