LMPO
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(X, 0()) -> X
, +(X, s(Y)) -> s(+(X, Y))
, f(0(), s(0()), X) -> f(X, +(X, X), X)
, g(X, Y) -> X
, g(X, Y) -> Y}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
MPO
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(X, 0()) -> X
, +(X, s(Y)) -> s(+(X, Y))
, f(0(), s(0()), X) -> f(X, +(X, X), X)
, g(X, Y) -> X
, g(X, Y) -> Y}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
POP*
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(X, 0()) -> X
, +(X, s(Y)) -> s(+(X, Y))
, f(0(), s(0()), X) -> f(X, +(X, X), X)
, g(X, Y) -> X
, g(X, Y) -> Y}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
POP* (PS)
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(X, 0()) -> X
, +(X, s(Y)) -> s(+(X, Y))
, f(0(), s(0()), X) -> f(X, +(X, X), X)
, g(X, Y) -> X
, g(X, Y) -> Y}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
Small POP*
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(X, 0()) -> X
, +(X, s(Y)) -> s(+(X, Y))
, f(0(), s(0()), X) -> f(X, +(X, X), X)
, g(X, Y) -> X
, g(X, Y) -> Y}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..
Small POP* (PS)
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(X, 0()) -> X
, +(X, s(Y)) -> s(+(X, Y))
, f(0(), s(0()), X) -> f(X, +(X, X), X)
, g(X, Y) -> X
, g(X, Y) -> Y}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..