MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { times(x, 0()) -> 0() , times(x, s(y)) -> plus(times(x, y), x) , plus(x, 0()) -> x , plus(x, s(y)) -> s(plus(x, y)) , plus(0(), x) -> x , plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We add following dependency tuples: Strict DPs: { times^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , times^#(x, s(y)) -> c_2(plus^#(times(x, y), x), times^#(x, y)) , plus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3() , plus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_4(plus^#(x, y)) , plus^#(0(), x) -> c_5() , plus^#(s(x), y) -> c_6(plus^#(x, y)) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { times^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , times^#(x, s(y)) -> c_2(plus^#(times(x, y), x), times^#(x, y)) , plus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3() , plus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_4(plus^#(x, y)) , plus^#(0(), x) -> c_5() , plus^#(s(x), y) -> c_6(plus^#(x, y)) } Weak Trs: { times(x, 0()) -> 0() , times(x, s(y)) -> plus(times(x, y), x) , plus(x, 0()) -> x , plus(x, s(y)) -> s(plus(x, y)) , plus(0(), x) -> x , plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {1,3,5} by applications of Pre({1,3,5}) = {2,4,6}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: times^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , 2: times^#(x, s(y)) -> c_2(plus^#(times(x, y), x), times^#(x, y)) , 3: plus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3() , 4: plus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_4(plus^#(x, y)) , 5: plus^#(0(), x) -> c_5() , 6: plus^#(s(x), y) -> c_6(plus^#(x, y)) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { times^#(x, s(y)) -> c_2(plus^#(times(x, y), x), times^#(x, y)) , plus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_4(plus^#(x, y)) , plus^#(s(x), y) -> c_6(plus^#(x, y)) } Weak DPs: { times^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , plus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3() , plus^#(0(), x) -> c_5() } Weak Trs: { times(x, 0()) -> 0() , times(x, s(y)) -> plus(times(x, y), x) , plus(x, 0()) -> x , plus(x, s(y)) -> s(plus(x, y)) , plus(0(), x) -> x , plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. { times^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , plus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3() , plus^#(0(), x) -> c_5() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { times^#(x, s(y)) -> c_2(plus^#(times(x, y), x), times^#(x, y)) , plus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_4(plus^#(x, y)) , plus^#(s(x), y) -> c_6(plus^#(x, y)) } Weak Trs: { times(x, 0()) -> 0() , times(x, s(y)) -> plus(times(x, y), x) , plus(x, 0()) -> x , plus(x, s(y)) -> s(plus(x, y)) , plus(0(), x) -> x , plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'matrices' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 4' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 2) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 3' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 3) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 3' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 4) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 2' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 5) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 2' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 6) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 1' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 2) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..