MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { cond(true(), x, y) -> cond(gr(x, y), y, x) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y)) -> gr(x, y) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We add following dependency tuples: Strict DPs: { cond^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond^#(gr(x, y), y, x), gr^#(x, y)) , gr^#(0(), x) -> c_2() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_3() , gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(gr^#(x, y)) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { cond^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond^#(gr(x, y), y, x), gr^#(x, y)) , gr^#(0(), x) -> c_2() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_3() , gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(gr^#(x, y)) } Weak Trs: { cond(true(), x, y) -> cond(gr(x, y), y, x) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y)) -> gr(x, y) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {2,3} by applications of Pre({2,3}) = {1,4}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: cond^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond^#(gr(x, y), y, x), gr^#(x, y)) , 2: gr^#(0(), x) -> c_2() , 3: gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_3() , 4: gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(gr^#(x, y)) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { cond^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond^#(gr(x, y), y, x), gr^#(x, y)) , gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(gr^#(x, y)) } Weak DPs: { gr^#(0(), x) -> c_2() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_3() } Weak Trs: { cond(true(), x, y) -> cond(gr(x, y), y, x) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y)) -> gr(x, y) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. { gr^#(0(), x) -> c_2() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_3() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { cond^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond^#(gr(x, y), y, x), gr^#(x, y)) , gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(gr^#(x, y)) } Weak Trs: { cond(true(), x, y) -> cond(gr(x, y), y, x) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y)) -> gr(x, y) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: Weak Usable Rules: { gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y)) -> gr(x, y) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { cond^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond^#(gr(x, y), y, x), gr^#(x, y)) , gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(gr^#(x, y)) } Weak Trs: { gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y)) -> gr(x, y) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'matrices' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 4' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 2) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 3' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 3) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 3' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 4) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 2' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 5) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 2' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 6) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 1' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 2) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..