MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { f(X, X) -> f(a(), b()) , b() -> a() } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We add following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { f^#(X, X) -> c_1(f^#(a(), b())) , b^#() -> c_2() } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(X, X) -> c_1(f^#(a(), b())) , b^#() -> c_2() } Strict Trs: { f(X, X) -> f(a(), b()) , b() -> a() } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: Strict Usable Rules: { b() -> a() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(X, X) -> c_1(f^#(a(), b())) , b^#() -> c_2() } Strict Trs: { b() -> a() } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The weightgap principle applies (using the following constant growth matrix-interpretation) The following argument positions are usable: Uargs(f^#) = {2}, Uargs(c_1) = {1} TcT has computed following constructor-restricted matrix interpretation. [a] = [1] [b] = [2] [f^#](x1, x2) = [2] x1 + [1] x2 + [2] [c_1](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] [b^#] = [1] [c_2] = [2] This order satisfies following ordering constraints: [b()] = [2] > [1] = [a()] Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(X, X) -> c_1(f^#(a(), b())) , b^#() -> c_2() } Weak Trs: { b() -> a() } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {2} by applications of Pre({2}) = {}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: f^#(X, X) -> c_1(f^#(a(), b())) , 2: b^#() -> c_2() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(X, X) -> c_1(f^#(a(), b())) } Weak DPs: { b^#() -> c_2() } Weak Trs: { b() -> a() } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. { b^#() -> c_2() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(X, X) -> c_1(f^#(a(), b())) } Weak Trs: { b() -> a() } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'matrices' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 4' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 2) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 3' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 3) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 3' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 4) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 2' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 5) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 2' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 6) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 1' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 2) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..