MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { min(x, 0()) -> 0() , min(0(), y) -> 0() , min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y)) , max(x, 0()) -> x , max(0(), y) -> y , max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y)) , -(x, 0()) -> x , -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y) , gcd(x, 0(), 0()) -> x , gcd(x, s(y), s(z)) -> gcd(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))) , gcd(0(), y, 0()) -> y , gcd(0(), 0(), z) -> z , gcd(s(x), y, s(z)) -> gcd(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))) , gcd(s(x), s(y), z) -> gcd(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We add following dependency tuples: Strict DPs: { min^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , min^#(0(), y) -> c_2() , min^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(min^#(x, y)) , max^#(x, 0()) -> c_4() , max^#(0(), y) -> c_5() , max^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(max^#(x, y)) , -^#(x, 0()) -> c_7() , -^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_8(-^#(x, y)) , gcd^#(x, 0(), 0()) -> c_9() , gcd^#(x, s(y), s(z)) -> c_10(gcd^#(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))), -^#(max(y, z), min(y, z)), max^#(y, z), min^#(y, z), min^#(y, z)) , gcd^#(0(), y, 0()) -> c_11() , gcd^#(0(), 0(), z) -> c_12() , gcd^#(s(x), y, s(z)) -> c_13(gcd^#(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))), -^#(max(x, z), min(x, z)), max^#(x, z), min^#(x, z), min^#(x, z)) , gcd^#(s(x), s(y), z) -> c_14(gcd^#(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z), -^#(max(x, y), min(x, y)), max^#(x, y), min^#(x, y), min^#(x, y)) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { min^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , min^#(0(), y) -> c_2() , min^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(min^#(x, y)) , max^#(x, 0()) -> c_4() , max^#(0(), y) -> c_5() , max^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(max^#(x, y)) , -^#(x, 0()) -> c_7() , -^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_8(-^#(x, y)) , gcd^#(x, 0(), 0()) -> c_9() , gcd^#(x, s(y), s(z)) -> c_10(gcd^#(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))), -^#(max(y, z), min(y, z)), max^#(y, z), min^#(y, z), min^#(y, z)) , gcd^#(0(), y, 0()) -> c_11() , gcd^#(0(), 0(), z) -> c_12() , gcd^#(s(x), y, s(z)) -> c_13(gcd^#(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))), -^#(max(x, z), min(x, z)), max^#(x, z), min^#(x, z), min^#(x, z)) , gcd^#(s(x), s(y), z) -> c_14(gcd^#(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z), -^#(max(x, y), min(x, y)), max^#(x, y), min^#(x, y), min^#(x, y)) } Weak Trs: { min(x, 0()) -> 0() , min(0(), y) -> 0() , min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y)) , max(x, 0()) -> x , max(0(), y) -> y , max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y)) , -(x, 0()) -> x , -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y) , gcd(x, 0(), 0()) -> x , gcd(x, s(y), s(z)) -> gcd(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))) , gcd(0(), y, 0()) -> y , gcd(0(), 0(), z) -> z , gcd(s(x), y, s(z)) -> gcd(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))) , gcd(s(x), s(y), z) -> gcd(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {1,2,4,5,7,9,11,12} by applications of Pre({1,2,4,5,7,9,11,12}) = {3,6,8,10,13,14}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: min^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , 2: min^#(0(), y) -> c_2() , 3: min^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(min^#(x, y)) , 4: max^#(x, 0()) -> c_4() , 5: max^#(0(), y) -> c_5() , 6: max^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(max^#(x, y)) , 7: -^#(x, 0()) -> c_7() , 8: -^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_8(-^#(x, y)) , 9: gcd^#(x, 0(), 0()) -> c_9() , 10: gcd^#(x, s(y), s(z)) -> c_10(gcd^#(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))), -^#(max(y, z), min(y, z)), max^#(y, z), min^#(y, z), min^#(y, z)) , 11: gcd^#(0(), y, 0()) -> c_11() , 12: gcd^#(0(), 0(), z) -> c_12() , 13: gcd^#(s(x), y, s(z)) -> c_13(gcd^#(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))), -^#(max(x, z), min(x, z)), max^#(x, z), min^#(x, z), min^#(x, z)) , 14: gcd^#(s(x), s(y), z) -> c_14(gcd^#(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z), -^#(max(x, y), min(x, y)), max^#(x, y), min^#(x, y), min^#(x, y)) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { min^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(min^#(x, y)) , max^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(max^#(x, y)) , -^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_8(-^#(x, y)) , gcd^#(x, s(y), s(z)) -> c_10(gcd^#(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))), -^#(max(y, z), min(y, z)), max^#(y, z), min^#(y, z), min^#(y, z)) , gcd^#(s(x), y, s(z)) -> c_13(gcd^#(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))), -^#(max(x, z), min(x, z)), max^#(x, z), min^#(x, z), min^#(x, z)) , gcd^#(s(x), s(y), z) -> c_14(gcd^#(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z), -^#(max(x, y), min(x, y)), max^#(x, y), min^#(x, y), min^#(x, y)) } Weak DPs: { min^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , min^#(0(), y) -> c_2() , max^#(x, 0()) -> c_4() , max^#(0(), y) -> c_5() , -^#(x, 0()) -> c_7() , gcd^#(x, 0(), 0()) -> c_9() , gcd^#(0(), y, 0()) -> c_11() , gcd^#(0(), 0(), z) -> c_12() } Weak Trs: { min(x, 0()) -> 0() , min(0(), y) -> 0() , min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y)) , max(x, 0()) -> x , max(0(), y) -> y , max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y)) , -(x, 0()) -> x , -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y) , gcd(x, 0(), 0()) -> x , gcd(x, s(y), s(z)) -> gcd(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))) , gcd(0(), y, 0()) -> y , gcd(0(), 0(), z) -> z , gcd(s(x), y, s(z)) -> gcd(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))) , gcd(s(x), s(y), z) -> gcd(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. { min^#(x, 0()) -> c_1() , min^#(0(), y) -> c_2() , max^#(x, 0()) -> c_4() , max^#(0(), y) -> c_5() , -^#(x, 0()) -> c_7() , gcd^#(x, 0(), 0()) -> c_9() , gcd^#(0(), y, 0()) -> c_11() , gcd^#(0(), 0(), z) -> c_12() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { min^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(min^#(x, y)) , max^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(max^#(x, y)) , -^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_8(-^#(x, y)) , gcd^#(x, s(y), s(z)) -> c_10(gcd^#(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))), -^#(max(y, z), min(y, z)), max^#(y, z), min^#(y, z), min^#(y, z)) , gcd^#(s(x), y, s(z)) -> c_13(gcd^#(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))), -^#(max(x, z), min(x, z)), max^#(x, z), min^#(x, z), min^#(x, z)) , gcd^#(s(x), s(y), z) -> c_14(gcd^#(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z), -^#(max(x, y), min(x, y)), max^#(x, y), min^#(x, y), min^#(x, y)) } Weak Trs: { min(x, 0()) -> 0() , min(0(), y) -> 0() , min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y)) , max(x, 0()) -> x , max(0(), y) -> y , max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y)) , -(x, 0()) -> x , -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y) , gcd(x, 0(), 0()) -> x , gcd(x, s(y), s(z)) -> gcd(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))) , gcd(0(), y, 0()) -> y , gcd(0(), 0(), z) -> z , gcd(s(x), y, s(z)) -> gcd(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))) , gcd(s(x), s(y), z) -> gcd(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: Weak Usable Rules: { min(x, 0()) -> 0() , min(0(), y) -> 0() , min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y)) , max(x, 0()) -> x , max(0(), y) -> y , max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y)) , -(x, 0()) -> x , -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { min^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(min^#(x, y)) , max^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(max^#(x, y)) , -^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_8(-^#(x, y)) , gcd^#(x, s(y), s(z)) -> c_10(gcd^#(x, -(max(y, z), min(y, z)), s(min(y, z))), -^#(max(y, z), min(y, z)), max^#(y, z), min^#(y, z), min^#(y, z)) , gcd^#(s(x), y, s(z)) -> c_13(gcd^#(-(max(x, z), min(x, z)), y, s(min(x, z))), -^#(max(x, z), min(x, z)), max^#(x, z), min^#(x, z), min^#(x, z)) , gcd^#(s(x), s(y), z) -> c_14(gcd^#(-(max(x, y), min(x, y)), s(min(x, y)), z), -^#(max(x, y), min(x, y)), max^#(x, y), min^#(x, y), min^#(x, y)) } Weak Trs: { min(x, 0()) -> 0() , min(0(), y) -> 0() , min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y)) , max(x, 0()) -> x , max(0(), y) -> y , max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y)) , -(x, 0()) -> x , -(s(x), s(y)) -> -(x, y) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The input cannot be shown compatible Arrrr..