MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { f(X) -> if(X, c(), n__f(true())) , f(X) -> n__f(X) , if(true(), X, Y) -> X , if(false(), X, Y) -> activate(Y) , activate(X) -> X , activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We add following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { f^#(X) -> c_1(if^#(X, c(), n__f(true()))) , f^#(X) -> c_2() , if^#(true(), X, Y) -> c_3() , if^#(false(), X, Y) -> c_4(activate^#(Y)) , activate^#(X) -> c_5() , activate^#(n__f(X)) -> c_6(f^#(X)) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(X) -> c_1(if^#(X, c(), n__f(true()))) , f^#(X) -> c_2() , if^#(true(), X, Y) -> c_3() , if^#(false(), X, Y) -> c_4(activate^#(Y)) , activate^#(X) -> c_5() , activate^#(n__f(X)) -> c_6(f^#(X)) } Strict Trs: { f(X) -> if(X, c(), n__f(true())) , f(X) -> n__f(X) , if(true(), X, Y) -> X , if(false(), X, Y) -> activate(Y) , activate(X) -> X , activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE No rule is usable, rules are removed from the input problem. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(X) -> c_1(if^#(X, c(), n__f(true()))) , f^#(X) -> c_2() , if^#(true(), X, Y) -> c_3() , if^#(false(), X, Y) -> c_4(activate^#(Y)) , activate^#(X) -> c_5() , activate^#(n__f(X)) -> c_6(f^#(X)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The weightgap principle applies (using the following constant growth matrix-interpretation) The following argument positions are usable: Uargs(c_1) = {1}, Uargs(c_4) = {1}, Uargs(c_6) = {1} TcT has computed following constructor-restricted matrix interpretation. [c] = [2] [n__f](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] [true] = [1] [false] = [1] [f^#](x1) = [2] x1 + [1] [c_1](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] [if^#](x1, x2, x3) = [2] x1 + [1] x2 + [2] x3 + [1] [c_2] = [0] [c_3] = [2] [c_4](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] [activate^#](x1) = [2] x1 + [1] [c_5] = [0] [c_6](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] This order satisfies following ordering constraints: Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(X) -> c_1(if^#(X, c(), n__f(true()))) } Weak DPs: { f^#(X) -> c_2() , if^#(true(), X, Y) -> c_3() , if^#(false(), X, Y) -> c_4(activate^#(Y)) , activate^#(X) -> c_5() , activate^#(n__f(X)) -> c_6(f^#(X)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. { f^#(X) -> c_2() , if^#(true(), X, Y) -> c_3() , activate^#(X) -> c_5() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(X) -> c_1(if^#(X, c(), n__f(true()))) } Weak DPs: { if^#(false(), X, Y) -> c_4(activate^#(Y)) , activate^#(n__f(X)) -> c_6(f^#(X)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The input cannot be shown compatible Arrrr..