MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { a__U11(X1, X2) -> U11(X1, X2) , a__U11(tt(), N) -> mark(N) , mark(tt()) -> tt() , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) , mark(0()) -> 0() , mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)) , mark(isNat(X)) -> a__isNat(X) , mark(U11(X1, X2)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2) , mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) , mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2) , a__U21(X1, X2, X3) -> U21(X1, X2, X3) , a__U21(tt(), M, N) -> s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M))) , a__plus(X1, X2) -> plus(X1, X2) , a__plus(N, s(M)) -> a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) , a__plus(N, 0()) -> a__U11(a__isNat(N), N) , a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) , a__and(tt(), X) -> mark(X) , a__isNat(X) -> isNat(X) , a__isNat(s(V1)) -> a__isNat(V1) , a__isNat(0()) -> tt() , a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We add following dependency tuples: Strict DPs: { a__U11^#(X1, X2) -> c_1() , a__U11^#(tt(), N) -> c_2(mark^#(N)) , mark^#(tt()) -> c_3() , mark^#(s(X)) -> c_4(mark^#(X)) , mark^#(0()) -> c_5() , mark^#(plus(X1, X2)) -> c_6(a__plus^#(mark(X1), mark(X2)), mark^#(X1), mark^#(X2)) , mark^#(isNat(X)) -> c_7(a__isNat^#(X)) , mark^#(U11(X1, X2)) -> c_8(a__U11^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , mark^#(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> c_9(a__U21^#(mark(X1), X2, X3), mark^#(X1)) , mark^#(and(X1, X2)) -> c_10(a__and^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , a__plus^#(X1, X2) -> c_13() , a__plus^#(N, s(M)) -> c_14(a__U21^#(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N), a__and^#(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), a__isNat^#(M)) , a__plus^#(N, 0()) -> c_15(a__U11^#(a__isNat(N), N), a__isNat^#(N)) , a__isNat^#(X) -> c_18() , a__isNat^#(s(V1)) -> c_19(a__isNat^#(V1)) , a__isNat^#(0()) -> c_20() , a__isNat^#(plus(V1, V2)) -> c_21(a__and^#(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)), a__isNat^#(V1)) , a__U21^#(X1, X2, X3) -> c_11() , a__U21^#(tt(), M, N) -> c_12(a__plus^#(mark(N), mark(M)), mark^#(N), mark^#(M)) , a__and^#(X1, X2) -> c_16() , a__and^#(tt(), X) -> c_17(mark^#(X)) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { a__U11^#(X1, X2) -> c_1() , a__U11^#(tt(), N) -> c_2(mark^#(N)) , mark^#(tt()) -> c_3() , mark^#(s(X)) -> c_4(mark^#(X)) , mark^#(0()) -> c_5() , mark^#(plus(X1, X2)) -> c_6(a__plus^#(mark(X1), mark(X2)), mark^#(X1), mark^#(X2)) , mark^#(isNat(X)) -> c_7(a__isNat^#(X)) , mark^#(U11(X1, X2)) -> c_8(a__U11^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , mark^#(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> c_9(a__U21^#(mark(X1), X2, X3), mark^#(X1)) , mark^#(and(X1, X2)) -> c_10(a__and^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , a__plus^#(X1, X2) -> c_13() , a__plus^#(N, s(M)) -> c_14(a__U21^#(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N), a__and^#(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), a__isNat^#(M)) , a__plus^#(N, 0()) -> c_15(a__U11^#(a__isNat(N), N), a__isNat^#(N)) , a__isNat^#(X) -> c_18() , a__isNat^#(s(V1)) -> c_19(a__isNat^#(V1)) , a__isNat^#(0()) -> c_20() , a__isNat^#(plus(V1, V2)) -> c_21(a__and^#(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)), a__isNat^#(V1)) , a__U21^#(X1, X2, X3) -> c_11() , a__U21^#(tt(), M, N) -> c_12(a__plus^#(mark(N), mark(M)), mark^#(N), mark^#(M)) , a__and^#(X1, X2) -> c_16() , a__and^#(tt(), X) -> c_17(mark^#(X)) } Weak Trs: { a__U11(X1, X2) -> U11(X1, X2) , a__U11(tt(), N) -> mark(N) , mark(tt()) -> tt() , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) , mark(0()) -> 0() , mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)) , mark(isNat(X)) -> a__isNat(X) , mark(U11(X1, X2)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2) , mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) , mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2) , a__U21(X1, X2, X3) -> U21(X1, X2, X3) , a__U21(tt(), M, N) -> s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M))) , a__plus(X1, X2) -> plus(X1, X2) , a__plus(N, s(M)) -> a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) , a__plus(N, 0()) -> a__U11(a__isNat(N), N) , a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) , a__and(tt(), X) -> mark(X) , a__isNat(X) -> isNat(X) , a__isNat(s(V1)) -> a__isNat(V1) , a__isNat(0()) -> tt() , a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {1,3,5,11,14,16,18,20} by applications of Pre({1,3,5,11,14,16,18,20}) = {2,4,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,15,17,19,21}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: a__U11^#(X1, X2) -> c_1() , 2: a__U11^#(tt(), N) -> c_2(mark^#(N)) , 3: mark^#(tt()) -> c_3() , 4: mark^#(s(X)) -> c_4(mark^#(X)) , 5: mark^#(0()) -> c_5() , 6: mark^#(plus(X1, X2)) -> c_6(a__plus^#(mark(X1), mark(X2)), mark^#(X1), mark^#(X2)) , 7: mark^#(isNat(X)) -> c_7(a__isNat^#(X)) , 8: mark^#(U11(X1, X2)) -> c_8(a__U11^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , 9: mark^#(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> c_9(a__U21^#(mark(X1), X2, X3), mark^#(X1)) , 10: mark^#(and(X1, X2)) -> c_10(a__and^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , 11: a__plus^#(X1, X2) -> c_13() , 12: a__plus^#(N, s(M)) -> c_14(a__U21^#(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N), a__and^#(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), a__isNat^#(M)) , 13: a__plus^#(N, 0()) -> c_15(a__U11^#(a__isNat(N), N), a__isNat^#(N)) , 14: a__isNat^#(X) -> c_18() , 15: a__isNat^#(s(V1)) -> c_19(a__isNat^#(V1)) , 16: a__isNat^#(0()) -> c_20() , 17: a__isNat^#(plus(V1, V2)) -> c_21(a__and^#(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)), a__isNat^#(V1)) , 18: a__U21^#(X1, X2, X3) -> c_11() , 19: a__U21^#(tt(), M, N) -> c_12(a__plus^#(mark(N), mark(M)), mark^#(N), mark^#(M)) , 20: a__and^#(X1, X2) -> c_16() , 21: a__and^#(tt(), X) -> c_17(mark^#(X)) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { a__U11^#(tt(), N) -> c_2(mark^#(N)) , mark^#(s(X)) -> c_4(mark^#(X)) , mark^#(plus(X1, X2)) -> c_6(a__plus^#(mark(X1), mark(X2)), mark^#(X1), mark^#(X2)) , mark^#(isNat(X)) -> c_7(a__isNat^#(X)) , mark^#(U11(X1, X2)) -> c_8(a__U11^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , mark^#(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> c_9(a__U21^#(mark(X1), X2, X3), mark^#(X1)) , mark^#(and(X1, X2)) -> c_10(a__and^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , a__plus^#(N, s(M)) -> c_14(a__U21^#(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N), a__and^#(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), a__isNat^#(M)) , a__plus^#(N, 0()) -> c_15(a__U11^#(a__isNat(N), N), a__isNat^#(N)) , a__isNat^#(s(V1)) -> c_19(a__isNat^#(V1)) , a__isNat^#(plus(V1, V2)) -> c_21(a__and^#(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)), a__isNat^#(V1)) , a__U21^#(tt(), M, N) -> c_12(a__plus^#(mark(N), mark(M)), mark^#(N), mark^#(M)) , a__and^#(tt(), X) -> c_17(mark^#(X)) } Weak DPs: { a__U11^#(X1, X2) -> c_1() , mark^#(tt()) -> c_3() , mark^#(0()) -> c_5() , a__plus^#(X1, X2) -> c_13() , a__isNat^#(X) -> c_18() , a__isNat^#(0()) -> c_20() , a__U21^#(X1, X2, X3) -> c_11() , a__and^#(X1, X2) -> c_16() } Weak Trs: { a__U11(X1, X2) -> U11(X1, X2) , a__U11(tt(), N) -> mark(N) , mark(tt()) -> tt() , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) , mark(0()) -> 0() , mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)) , mark(isNat(X)) -> a__isNat(X) , mark(U11(X1, X2)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2) , mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) , mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2) , a__U21(X1, X2, X3) -> U21(X1, X2, X3) , a__U21(tt(), M, N) -> s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M))) , a__plus(X1, X2) -> plus(X1, X2) , a__plus(N, s(M)) -> a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) , a__plus(N, 0()) -> a__U11(a__isNat(N), N) , a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) , a__and(tt(), X) -> mark(X) , a__isNat(X) -> isNat(X) , a__isNat(s(V1)) -> a__isNat(V1) , a__isNat(0()) -> tt() , a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. { a__U11^#(X1, X2) -> c_1() , mark^#(tt()) -> c_3() , mark^#(0()) -> c_5() , a__plus^#(X1, X2) -> c_13() , a__isNat^#(X) -> c_18() , a__isNat^#(0()) -> c_20() , a__U21^#(X1, X2, X3) -> c_11() , a__and^#(X1, X2) -> c_16() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { a__U11^#(tt(), N) -> c_2(mark^#(N)) , mark^#(s(X)) -> c_4(mark^#(X)) , mark^#(plus(X1, X2)) -> c_6(a__plus^#(mark(X1), mark(X2)), mark^#(X1), mark^#(X2)) , mark^#(isNat(X)) -> c_7(a__isNat^#(X)) , mark^#(U11(X1, X2)) -> c_8(a__U11^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , mark^#(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> c_9(a__U21^#(mark(X1), X2, X3), mark^#(X1)) , mark^#(and(X1, X2)) -> c_10(a__and^#(mark(X1), X2), mark^#(X1)) , a__plus^#(N, s(M)) -> c_14(a__U21^#(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N), a__and^#(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), a__isNat^#(M)) , a__plus^#(N, 0()) -> c_15(a__U11^#(a__isNat(N), N), a__isNat^#(N)) , a__isNat^#(s(V1)) -> c_19(a__isNat^#(V1)) , a__isNat^#(plus(V1, V2)) -> c_21(a__and^#(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)), a__isNat^#(V1)) , a__U21^#(tt(), M, N) -> c_12(a__plus^#(mark(N), mark(M)), mark^#(N), mark^#(M)) , a__and^#(tt(), X) -> c_17(mark^#(X)) } Weak Trs: { a__U11(X1, X2) -> U11(X1, X2) , a__U11(tt(), N) -> mark(N) , mark(tt()) -> tt() , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) , mark(0()) -> 0() , mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)) , mark(isNat(X)) -> a__isNat(X) , mark(U11(X1, X2)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2) , mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) , mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2) , a__U21(X1, X2, X3) -> U21(X1, X2, X3) , a__U21(tt(), M, N) -> s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M))) , a__plus(X1, X2) -> plus(X1, X2) , a__plus(N, s(M)) -> a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) , a__plus(N, 0()) -> a__U11(a__isNat(N), N) , a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) , a__and(tt(), X) -> mark(X) , a__isNat(X) -> isNat(X) , a__isNat(s(V1)) -> a__isNat(V1) , a__isNat(0()) -> tt() , a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE The input cannot be shown compatible Arrrr..