YES Problem: 2nd(cons(X,n__cons(Y,Z))) -> activate(Y) from(X) -> cons(X,n__from(s(X))) cons(X1,X2) -> n__cons(X1,X2) from(X) -> n__from(X) activate(n__cons(X1,X2)) -> cons(X1,X2) activate(n__from(X)) -> from(X) activate(X) -> X Proof: Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=1 interpretation: [n__from](x0) = x0 + 1, [s](x0) = 2x0, [from](x0) = 5x0 + 2, [activate](x0) = 6x0, [2nd](x0) = 3x0, [cons](x0, x1) = x0 + 2x1, [n__cons](x0, x1) = x0 + x1 orientation: 2nd(cons(X,n__cons(Y,Z))) = 3X + 6Y + 6Z >= 6Y = activate(Y) from(X) = 5X + 2 >= 5X + 2 = cons(X,n__from(s(X))) cons(X1,X2) = X1 + 2X2 >= X1 + X2 = n__cons(X1,X2) from(X) = 5X + 2 >= X + 1 = n__from(X) activate(n__cons(X1,X2)) = 6X1 + 6X2 >= X1 + 2X2 = cons(X1,X2) activate(n__from(X)) = 6X + 6 >= 5X + 2 = from(X) activate(X) = 6X >= X = X problem: 2nd(cons(X,n__cons(Y,Z))) -> activate(Y) from(X) -> cons(X,n__from(s(X))) cons(X1,X2) -> n__cons(X1,X2) activate(n__cons(X1,X2)) -> cons(X1,X2) activate(X) -> X Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=1 interpretation: [n__from](x0) = x0 + 3, [s](x0) = 4x0, [from](x0) = 6x0 + 6, [activate](x0) = 3x0 + 4, [2nd](x0) = 3x0 + 1, [cons](x0, x1) = 2x0 + x1 + 2, [n__cons](x0, x1) = x0 + x1 + 2 orientation: 2nd(cons(X,n__cons(Y,Z))) = 6X + 3Y + 3Z + 13 >= 3Y + 4 = activate(Y) from(X) = 6X + 6 >= 6X + 5 = cons(X,n__from(s(X))) cons(X1,X2) = 2X1 + X2 + 2 >= X1 + X2 + 2 = n__cons(X1,X2) activate(n__cons(X1,X2)) = 3X1 + 3X2 + 10 >= 2X1 + X2 + 2 = cons(X1,X2) activate(X) = 3X + 4 >= X = X problem: cons(X1,X2) -> n__cons(X1,X2) Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=3 interpretation: [1 0 0] [1 0 0] [1] [cons](x0, x1) = [0 0 0]x0 + [0 0 0]x1 + [0] [0 0 0] [0 0 0] [0], [1 0 0] [1 0 0] [n__cons](x0, x1) = [0 0 0]x0 + [0 0 0]x1 [0 0 0] [0 0 0] orientation: [1 0 0] [1 0 0] [1] [1 0 0] [1 0 0] cons(X1,X2) = [0 0 0]X1 + [0 0 0]X2 + [0] >= [0 0 0]X1 + [0 0 0]X2 = n__cons(X1,X2) [0 0 0] [0 0 0] [0] [0 0 0] [0 0 0] problem: Qed