YES Problem: a(a(x1)) -> b(b(b(x1))) a(x1) -> d(c(d(x1))) b(b(x1)) -> c(c(c(x1))) c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1))) c(d(d(x1))) -> a(x1) Proof: Arctic Interpretation Processor: dimension: 1 interpretation: [c](x0) = 6x0, [d](x0) = 4x0, [b](x0) = 9x0, [a](x0) = 14x0 orientation: a(a(x1)) = 28x1 >= 27x1 = b(b(b(x1))) a(x1) = 14x1 >= 14x1 = d(c(d(x1))) b(b(x1)) = 18x1 >= 18x1 = c(c(c(x1))) c(c(x1)) = 12x1 >= 12x1 = d(d(d(x1))) c(d(d(x1))) = 14x1 >= 14x1 = a(x1) problem: a(x1) -> d(c(d(x1))) b(b(x1)) -> c(c(c(x1))) c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1))) c(d(d(x1))) -> a(x1) Arctic Interpretation Processor: dimension: 2 interpretation: [0 0 ] [c](x0) = [-& 0 ]x0, [0 0 ] [d](x0) = [-& 0 ]x0, [0 1] [b](x0) = [0 0]x0, [0 0 ] [a](x0) = [-& 0 ]x0 orientation: [0 0 ] [0 0 ] a(x1) = [-& 0 ]x1 >= [-& 0 ]x1 = d(c(d(x1))) [1 1] [0 0 ] b(b(x1)) = [0 1]x1 >= [-& 0 ]x1 = c(c(c(x1))) [0 0 ] [0 0 ] c(c(x1)) = [-& 0 ]x1 >= [-& 0 ]x1 = d(d(d(x1))) [0 0 ] [0 0 ] c(d(d(x1))) = [-& 0 ]x1 >= [-& 0 ]x1 = a(x1) problem: a(x1) -> d(c(d(x1))) c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1))) c(d(d(x1))) -> a(x1) Arctic Interpretation Processor: dimension: 2 interpretation: [2 2] [c](x0) = [0 0]x0, [0 0 ] [d](x0) = [-& 0 ]x0, [2 2] [a](x0) = [0 0]x0 orientation: [2 2] [2 2] a(x1) = [0 0]x1 >= [0 0]x1 = d(c(d(x1))) [4 4] [0 0 ] c(c(x1)) = [2 2]x1 >= [-& 0 ]x1 = d(d(d(x1))) [2 2] [2 2] c(d(d(x1))) = [0 0]x1 >= [0 0]x1 = a(x1) problem: a(x1) -> d(c(d(x1))) c(d(d(x1))) -> a(x1) String Reversal Processor: a(x1) -> d(c(d(x1))) d(d(c(x1))) -> a(x1) Bounds Processor: bound: 1 enrichment: match automaton: final states: {5,1} transitions: a0(2) -> 5* d1(6) -> 7* d1(8) -> 9* c1(7) -> 8* f40() -> 2* d0(2) -> 3* d0(4) -> 1* c0(3) -> 4* 2 -> 6* 5 -> 7,3 9 -> 5* problem: Qed