YES Problem: sum(0()) -> 0() sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x),s(x)) sum1(0()) -> 0() sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x))) Proof: Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=3 interpretation: [1 1 1] [sum1](x0) = [1 1 1]x0 [1 1 1] , [1 0 0] [1 0 0] [+](x0, x1) = [0 0 0]x0 + [0 0 0]x1 [0 0 0] [0 1 1] , [1 1 0] [s](x0) = [1 1 1]x0 [1 0 1] , [1 0 1] [1] [sum](x0) = [0 0 0]x0 + [0] [1 1 1] [0], [0] [0] = [0] [0] orientation: [1] [0] sum(0()) = [0] >= [0] = 0() [0] [0] [2 1 1] [1] [2 1 1] [1] sum(s(x)) = [0 0 0]x + [0] >= [0 0 0]x + [0] = +(sum(x),s(x)) [3 2 2] [0] [2 1 2] [0] [0] [0] sum1(0()) = [0] >= [0] = 0() [0] [0] [3 2 2] [3 1 1] sum1(s(x)) = [3 2 2]x >= [3 2 2]x = s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x))) [3 2 2] [3 2 2] problem: sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x),s(x)) sum1(0()) -> 0() sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x))) Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=3 interpretation: [1 1 1] [0] [sum1](x0) = [1 1 1]x0 + [1] [1 1 1] [1], [1 0 0] [1 0 0] [+](x0, x1) = [0 0 0]x0 + [0 1 1]x1 [0 0 0] [0 0 0] , [1 1 0] [0] [s](x0) = [1 0 1]x0 + [1] [1 1 1] [1], [1 1 1] [sum](x0) = [0 1 1]x0 [1 1 1] , [1] [0] = [0] [0] orientation: [3 2 2] [2] [2 2 1] [0] sum(s(x)) = [2 1 2]x + [2] >= [2 1 2]x + [2] = +(sum(x),s(x)) [3 2 2] [2] [0 0 0] [0] [1] [1] sum1(0()) = [2] >= [0] = 0() [2] [0] [3 2 2] [2] [3 2 2] [0] sum1(s(x)) = [3 2 2]x + [3] >= [3 1 1]x + [1] = s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x))) [3 2 2] [3] [3 2 2] [1] problem: sum1(0()) -> 0() Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=3 interpretation: [1 0 0] [1] [sum1](x0) = [0 0 0]x0 + [0] [0 0 0] [0], [0] [0] = [0] [0] orientation: [1] [0] sum1(0()) = [0] >= [0] = 0() [0] [0] problem: Qed