YES Problem: f(a(),h(x)) -> f(g(x),h(x)) h(g(x)) -> h(a()) g(h(x)) -> g(x) h(h(x)) -> x Proof: DP Processor: DPs: f#(a(),h(x)) -> g#(x) f#(a(),h(x)) -> f#(g(x),h(x)) h#(g(x)) -> h#(a()) g#(h(x)) -> g#(x) TRS: f(a(),h(x)) -> f(g(x),h(x)) h(g(x)) -> h(a()) g(h(x)) -> g(x) h(h(x)) -> x Usable Rule Processor: DPs: f#(a(),h(x)) -> g#(x) f#(a(),h(x)) -> f#(g(x),h(x)) h#(g(x)) -> h#(a()) g#(h(x)) -> g#(x) TRS: h(g(x)) -> h(a()) h(h(x)) -> x g(h(x)) -> g(x) Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=4 usable rules: h(g(x)) -> h(a()) h(h(x)) -> x g(h(x)) -> g(x) interpretation: [h#](x0) = [1 1 1 1]x0, [g#](x0) = [1 1 1 1]x0, [f#](x0, x1) = [0 0 0 1]x0 + [0 1 1 1]x1, [0 0 0 0] [1] [0 1 1 0] [1] [g](x0) = [0 0 0 0]x0 + [1] [0 0 0 0] [0], [1 1 0 0] [0] [0 0 1 1] [0] [h](x0) = [0 1 1 1]x0 + [1] [1 0 1 0] [1], [0] [1] [a] = [0] [1] orientation: f#(a(),h(x)) = [1 1 3 2]x + [3] >= [1 1 1 1]x = g#(x) f#(a(),h(x)) = [1 1 3 2]x + [3] >= [1 1 3 2]x + [2] = f#(g(x),h(x)) h#(g(x)) = [0 1 1 0]x + [3] >= [2] = h#(a()) g#(h(x)) = [2 2 3 2]x + [2] >= [1 1 1 1]x = g#(x) [0 1 1 0] [2] [1] [0 0 0 0] [1] [1] h(g(x)) = [0 1 1 0]x + [3] >= [3] = h(a()) [0 0 0 0] [3] [1] [1 1 1 1] [0] [1 1 2 1] [2] h(h(x)) = [1 1 3 2]x + [3] >= x = x [1 2 1 1] [2] [0 0 0 0] [1] [0 0 0 0] [1] [0 1 2 2] [2] [0 1 1 0] [1] g(h(x)) = [0 0 0 0]x + [1] >= [0 0 0 0]x + [1] = g(x) [0 0 0 0] [0] [0 0 0 0] [0] problem: DPs: TRS: h(g(x)) -> h(a()) h(h(x)) -> x g(h(x)) -> g(x) Qed