Tool Bounds
Execution Time | 6.635499e-2ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^1)) |
---|
Input | Der95 01 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ \(/(x, y), x) -> y
, /(x, \(y, x)) -> y
, /(.(y, x), x) -> y
, \(x, .(x, y)) -> y
, .(/(y, x), x) -> y
, .(x, \(x, y)) -> y
, /(x, e()) -> x
, \(e(), x) -> x
, .(x, e()) -> x
, .(e(), x) -> x
, /(x, x) -> e()
, \(x, x) -> e()}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 1.
The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
{ \_0(1, 1) -> 1
, e_0() -> 1
, e_1() -> 1
, /_0(1, 1) -> 1
, ._0(1, 1) -> 1}
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool EDA
Execution Time | 0.15875101ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^1)) |
---|
Input | Der95 01 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ \(/(x, y), x) -> y
, /(x, \(y, x)) -> y
, /(.(y, x), x) -> y
, \(x, .(x, y)) -> y
, .(/(y, x), x) -> y
, .(x, \(x, y)) -> y
, /(x, e()) -> x
, \(e(), x) -> x
, .(x, e()) -> x
, .(e(), x) -> x
, /(x, x) -> e()
, \(x, x) -> e()}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
\(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3]
e() = [0]
/(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3]
.(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool IDA
Execution Time | 0.2666309ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^1)) |
---|
Input | Der95 01 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ \(/(x, y), x) -> y
, /(x, \(y, x)) -> y
, /(.(y, x), x) -> y
, \(x, .(x, y)) -> y
, .(/(y, x), x) -> y
, .(x, \(x, y)) -> y
, /(x, e()) -> x
, \(e(), x) -> x
, .(x, e()) -> x
, .(e(), x) -> x
, /(x, x) -> e()
, \(x, x) -> e()}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(1)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
\(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3]
e() = [0]
/(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3]
.(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool TRI
Execution Time | 6.667304e-2ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^1)) |
---|
Input | Der95 01 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ \(/(x, y), x) -> y
, /(x, \(y, x)) -> y
, /(.(y, x), x) -> y
, \(x, .(x, y)) -> y
, .(/(y, x), x) -> y
, .(x, \(x, y)) -> y
, /(x, e()) -> x
, \(e(), x) -> x
, .(x, e()) -> x
, .(e(), x) -> x
, /(x, x) -> e()
, \(x, x) -> e()}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
\(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3]
e() = [2]
/(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3]
.(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool TRI2
Execution Time | 0.14037585ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | Der95 01 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ \(/(x, y), x) -> y
, /(x, \(y, x)) -> y
, /(.(y, x), x) -> y
, \(x, .(x, y)) -> y
, .(/(y, x), x) -> y
, .(x, \(x, y)) -> y
, /(x, e()) -> x
, \(e(), x) -> x
, .(x, e()) -> x
, .(e(), x) -> x
, /(x, x) -> e()
, \(x, x) -> e()}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
\(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 3] x2 + [3]
[0 1] [0 1] [1]
e() = [0]
[1]
/(x1, x2) = [1 2] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [2]
[0 1] [0 1] [2]
.(x1, x2) = [1 1] x1 + [1 1] x2 + [0]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))