Tool Bounds
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ h(c(s(x), c(s(0()), y)), z) -> h(y, c(s(0()), c(x, z)))
, h(x, c(y, z)) -> h(c(s(y), x), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 2.
The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
{ c_0(1, 1) -> 1
, c_1(1, 1) -> 4
, c_1(1, 2) -> 4
, c_1(3, 2) -> 2
, c_1(3, 4) -> 2
, c_1(7, 1) -> 6
, c_1(7, 6) -> 6
, c_1(7, 10) -> 6
, c_2(9, 1) -> 8
, c_2(9, 6) -> 8
, c_2(9, 8) -> 8
, c_2(9, 10) -> 8
, c_2(11, 8) -> 10
, h_0(1, 1) -> 1
, h_1(1, 2) -> 1
, h_1(6, 1) -> 1
, h_1(6, 2) -> 1
, h_1(8, 2) -> 1
, h_1(10, 2) -> 1
, h_2(8, 2) -> 1
, h_2(8, 4) -> 1
, h_2(10, 1) -> 1
, h_2(10, 2) -> 1
, s_0(1) -> 1
, s_1(1) -> 7
, s_1(5) -> 3
, s_2(1) -> 11
, s_2(3) -> 9
, 0_0() -> 1
, 0_1() -> 5}
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool CDI
stdout:
TIMEOUT
Statistics:
Number of monomials: 0
Last formula building started for bound 0
Last SAT solving started for bound 0Tool EDA
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^3))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ h(c(s(x), c(s(0()), y)), z) -> h(y, c(s(0()), c(x, z)))
, h(x, c(y, z)) -> h(c(s(y), x), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^3))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
c(x1, x2) = [1 0 0] x1 + [1 0 0] x2 + [0]
[0 0 1] [0 1 0] [0]
[0 1 0] [0 0 1] [1]
h(x1, x2) = [1 1 0] x1 + [1 0 1] x2 + [1]
[0 0 0] [0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0] [0 0 0] [0]
s(x1) = [1 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 0] [0]
[0 1 0] [0]
0() = [0]
[3]
[0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^3))Tool IDA
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ h(c(s(x), c(s(0()), y)), z) -> h(y, c(s(0()), c(x, z)))
, h(x, c(y, z)) -> h(c(s(y), x), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(2)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
c(x1, x2) = [1 0 3] x1 + [1 0 0] x2 + [0]
[0 1 0] [0 1 0] [0]
[0 0 0] [0 0 1] [2]
h(x1, x2) = [1 1 0] x1 + [1 0 2] x2 + [0]
[0 0 0] [0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0] [0 0 0] [0]
s(x1) = [1 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 3] [0]
[0 0 0] [0]
0() = [0]
[0]
[3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ h(c(s(x), c(s(0()), y)), z) -> h(y, c(s(0()), c(x, z)))
, h(x, c(y, z)) -> h(c(s(y), x), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
c(x1, x2) = [1 0 0] x1 + [1 0 0] x2 + [0]
[0 1 0] [0 1 0] [0]
[0 0 1] [0 0 1] [1]
h(x1, x2) = [1 1 0] x1 + [1 0 1] x2 + [0]
[0 0 0] [0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0] [0 0 0] [0]
s(x1) = [1 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 1] [0]
[0 0 0] [0]
0() = [0]
[0]
[3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool TRI2
stdout:
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ h(c(s(x), c(s(0()), y)), z) -> h(y, c(s(0()), c(x, z)))
, h(x, c(y, z)) -> h(c(s(y), x), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..