Tool Bounds
Execution Time | 60.032284ms |
---|
Answer | TIMEOUT |
---|
Input | SK90 2.06 |
---|
stdout:
TIMEOUT
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) -> +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
, +(*(x, y), +(x, z)) -> *(x, +(y, z))
, +(x, +(y, z)) -> +(+(x, y), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: TIMEOUT
Proof:
Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds.
Arrrr..Tool CDI
Execution Time | 4.119065ms |
---|
Answer | MAYBE |
---|
Input | SK90 2.06 |
---|
stdout:
MAYBE
Statistics:
Number of monomials: 783
Last formula building started for bound 3
Last SAT solving started for bound 3Tool EDA
Execution Time | 0.5950639ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.06 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) -> +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
, +(*(x, y), +(x, z)) -> *(x, +(y, z))
, +(x, +(y, z)) -> +(+(x, y), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
+(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 2] x2 + [1]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
*(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 1] [2]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool IDA
Execution Time | 0.80751705ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.06 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) -> +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
, +(*(x, y), +(x, z)) -> *(x, +(y, z))
, +(x, +(y, z)) -> +(+(x, y), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(2)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
+(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 2] x2 + [1]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
*(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 1] [2]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI
Execution Time | 0.23644018ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.06 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) -> +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
, +(*(x, y), +(x, z)) -> *(x, +(y, z))
, +(x, +(y, z)) -> +(+(x, y), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
+(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 2] x2 + [0]
[0 1] [0 1] [2]
*(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 1] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI2
Execution Time | 0.22542119ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.06 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ +(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) -> +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
, +(*(x, y), +(x, z)) -> *(x, +(y, z))
, +(x, +(y, z)) -> +(+(x, y), z)}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
+(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 2] x2 + [0]
[0 1] [0 1] [2]
*(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 1] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))