Tool Bounds
Execution Time | 60.02835ms |
---|
Answer | TIMEOUT |
---|
Input | SK90 2.33 |
---|
stdout:
TIMEOUT
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ not(or(x, y)) -> and(not(x), not(y))
, not(and(x, y)) -> or(not(x), not(y))
, not(not(x)) -> x
, and(x, x) -> x
, or(x, x) -> x}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: TIMEOUT
Proof:
Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds.
Arrrr..Tool CDI
Execution Time | 0.795367ms |
---|
Answer | MAYBE |
---|
Input | SK90 2.33 |
---|
stdout:
MAYBE
Statistics:
Number of monomials: 423
Last formula building started for bound 3
Last SAT solving started for bound 3Tool EDA
Execution Time | 0.34388494ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.33 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ not(or(x, y)) -> and(not(x), not(y))
, not(and(x, y)) -> or(not(x), not(y))
, not(not(x)) -> x
, and(x, x) -> x
, or(x, x) -> x}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
or(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
and(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
not(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [1]
[0 1] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool IDA
Execution Time | 0.6900959ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.33 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ not(or(x, y)) -> and(not(x), not(y))
, not(and(x, y)) -> or(not(x), not(y))
, not(not(x)) -> x
, and(x, x) -> x
, or(x, x) -> x}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(2)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
or(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
and(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
not(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [2]
[0 1] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI
Execution Time | 0.15747094ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.33 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ not(or(x, y)) -> and(not(x), not(y))
, not(and(x, y)) -> or(not(x), not(y))
, not(not(x)) -> x
, and(x, x) -> x
, or(x, x) -> x}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
or(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
and(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
not(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [2]
[0 1] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI2
Execution Time | 0.14113116ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.33 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ not(or(x, y)) -> and(not(x), not(y))
, not(and(x, y)) -> or(not(x), not(y))
, not(not(x)) -> x
, and(x, x) -> x
, or(x, x) -> x}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
or(x1, x2) = [1 2] x1 + [1 2] x2 + [2]
[0 1] [0 1] [1]
and(x1, x2) = [1 2] x1 + [1 2] x2 + [2]
[0 1] [0 1] [1]
not(x1) = [1 2] x1 + [1]
[0 1] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))