Tool Bounds
Execution Time | 4.2124987e-2ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^1)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.60 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{f(g(f(a()), h(a(), f(a())))) ->
f(h(g(f(a()), a()), g(f(a()), f(a()))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 1.
The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
{ a_0() -> 1
, a_1() -> 9
, a_1() -> 10
, a_1() -> 13
, a_1() -> 14
, f_0(1) -> 2
, f_0(2) -> 2
, f_0(3) -> 2
, f_0(4) -> 2
, f_1(5) -> 2
, f_1(10) -> 8
, f_1(13) -> 11
, f_1(14) -> 12
, h_0(1, 1) -> 3
, h_0(1, 2) -> 3
, h_0(1, 3) -> 3
, h_0(1, 4) -> 3
, h_0(2, 1) -> 3
, h_0(2, 2) -> 3
, h_0(2, 3) -> 3
, h_0(2, 4) -> 3
, h_0(3, 1) -> 3
, h_0(3, 2) -> 3
, h_0(3, 3) -> 3
, h_0(3, 4) -> 3
, h_0(4, 1) -> 3
, h_0(4, 2) -> 3
, h_0(4, 3) -> 3
, h_0(4, 4) -> 3
, h_1(6, 7) -> 5
, g_0(1, 1) -> 4
, g_0(1, 2) -> 4
, g_0(1, 3) -> 4
, g_0(1, 4) -> 4
, g_0(2, 1) -> 4
, g_0(2, 2) -> 4
, g_0(2, 3) -> 4
, g_0(2, 4) -> 4
, g_0(3, 1) -> 4
, g_0(3, 2) -> 4
, g_0(3, 3) -> 4
, g_0(3, 4) -> 4
, g_0(4, 1) -> 4
, g_0(4, 2) -> 4
, g_0(4, 3) -> 4
, g_0(4, 4) -> 4
, g_1(8, 9) -> 6
, g_1(11, 12) -> 7}
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool CDI
Execution Time | 60.038002ms |
---|
Answer | TIMEOUT |
---|
Input | SK90 2.60 |
---|
stdout:
TIMEOUT
Statistics:
Number of monomials: 0
Last formula building started for bound 0
Last SAT solving started for bound 0Tool EDA
Execution Time | 2.377734ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.60 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{f(g(f(a()), h(a(), f(a())))) ->
f(h(g(f(a()), a()), g(f(a()), f(a()))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a() = [0]
[0]
f(x1) = [1 3] x1 + [0]
[0 1] [2]
h(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 1] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 0] [0]
g(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 1] x2 + [0]
[0 1] [0 0] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool IDA
Execution Time | 2.769451ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.60 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{f(g(f(a()), h(a(), f(a())))) ->
f(h(g(f(a()), a()), g(f(a()), f(a()))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(2)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a() = [0]
[0]
f(x1) = [1 3] x1 + [0]
[0 1] [2]
h(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 1] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 0] [0]
g(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 1] x2 + [0]
[0 1] [0 0] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI
Execution Time | 0.548692ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.60 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{f(g(f(a()), h(a(), f(a())))) ->
f(h(g(f(a()), a()), g(f(a()), f(a()))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a() = [0]
[1]
f(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [0]
[0 1] [0]
h(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 0] [3]
g(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 1] [0 1] [3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI2
Execution Time | 0.59772706ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 2.60 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{f(g(f(a()), h(a(), f(a())))) ->
f(h(g(f(a()), a()), g(f(a()), f(a()))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a() = [0]
[1]
f(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [0]
[0 1] [3]
h(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 0] [0]
g(x1, x2) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 1] [0 0] [3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))