Tool Bounds
Execution Time | 4.9230814e-2ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^1)) |
---|
Input | SK90 4.46 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(b()) -> g(a())
, f(a()) -> f(b())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 1.
The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
{ a_0() -> 1
, a_1() -> 5
, f_0(1) -> 2
, f_0(2) -> 2
, f_0(3) -> 2
, f_0(4) -> 2
, f_1(6) -> 2
, b_0() -> 3
, b_1() -> 6
, g_0(1) -> 4
, g_0(2) -> 4
, g_0(3) -> 4
, g_0(4) -> 4
, g_1(5) -> 4}
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool CDI
Execution Time | 5.6874037e-2ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 4.46 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
QUADRATIC upper bound on the derivational complexity
This TRS is terminating using the deltarestricted interpretation
g(delta, X0) = + 0*X0 + 0 + 1*X0*delta + 0*delta
a(delta) = + 1 + 0*delta
b(delta) = + 0 + 2*delta
f(delta, X0) = + 1*X0 + 0 + 3*X0*delta + 0*delta
g_tau_1(delta) = delta/(0 + 1 * delta)
f_tau_1(delta) = delta/(1 + 3 * delta)
Time: 0.018071 seconds
Statistics:
Number of monomials: 30
Last formula building started for bound 3
Last SAT solving started for bound 3Tool EDA
Execution Time | 0.24799204ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 4.46 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(b()) -> g(a())
, f(a()) -> f(b())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a() = [1]
[0]
f(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0] [1]
b() = [0]
[2]
g(x1) = [1 2] x1 + [0]
[0 0] [1]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool IDA
Execution Time | 0.2584741ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 4.46 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(b()) -> g(a())
, f(a()) -> f(b())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(2)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a() = [1]
[0]
f(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0] [1]
b() = [0]
[2]
g(x1) = [1 2] x1 + [0]
[0 0] [1]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI
Execution Time | 9.9509e-2ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 4.46 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(b()) -> g(a())
, f(a()) -> f(b())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a() = [1]
[3]
f(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [0]
[0 1] [3]
b() = [2]
[0]
g(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [2]
[0 0] [3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI2
Execution Time | 7.023096e-2ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | SK90 4.46 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(b()) -> g(a())
, f(a()) -> f(b())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a() = [1]
[3]
f(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [0]
[0 1] [3]
b() = [2]
[0]
g(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [2]
[0 0] [3]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))