Tool Bounds
stdout:
TIMEOUT
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(g(x1)) -> b(c(x1))
, g(x1) -> d(a(b(x1)))
, f(x1) -> a(g(x1))
, d(d(d(x1))) -> g(c(x1))
, d(d(x1)) -> c(f(x1))
, c(x1) -> g(x1)
, c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1)))
, b(b(x1)) -> c(d(x1))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: TIMEOUT
Proof:
Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds.
Arrrr..Tool CDI
stdout:
MAYBE
Statistics:
Number of monomials: 615
Last formula building started for bound 3
Last SAT solving started for bound 3Tool EDA
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^4))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(g(x1)) -> b(c(x1))
, g(x1) -> d(a(b(x1)))
, f(x1) -> a(g(x1))
, d(d(d(x1))) -> g(c(x1))
, d(d(x1)) -> c(f(x1))
, c(x1) -> g(x1)
, c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1)))
, b(b(x1)) -> c(d(x1))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^4))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
b(x1) = [1 3 1 2] x1 + [0]
[0 1 2 1] [2]
[0 0 0 2] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [2]
d(x1) = [1 2 0 3] x1 + [0]
[0 1 2 0] [0]
[0 0 0 2] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [2]
c(x1) = [1 3 2 3] x1 + [2]
[0 1 2 2] [0]
[0 0 0 1] [2]
[0 0 0 0] [2]
g(x1) = [1 3 2 2] x1 + [1]
[0 1 2 2] [0]
[0 0 0 1] [2]
[0 0 0 0] [2]
f(x1) = [1 3 2 2] x1 + [2]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
a(x1) = [1 0 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^4))Tool IDA
stdout:
TIMEOUT
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(g(x1)) -> b(c(x1))
, g(x1) -> d(a(b(x1)))
, f(x1) -> a(g(x1))
, d(d(d(x1))) -> g(c(x1))
, d(d(x1)) -> c(f(x1))
, c(x1) -> g(x1)
, c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1)))
, b(b(x1)) -> c(d(x1))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: TIMEOUT
Proof:
Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds.
Arrrr..Tool TRI
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(g(x1)) -> b(c(x1))
, g(x1) -> d(a(b(x1)))
, f(x1) -> a(g(x1))
, d(d(d(x1))) -> g(c(x1))
, d(d(x1)) -> c(f(x1))
, c(x1) -> g(x1)
, c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1)))
, b(b(x1)) -> c(d(x1))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
b(x1) = [1 3 2 2] x1 + [0]
[0 0 2 1] [2]
[0 0 1 2] [1]
[0 0 0 0] [1]
d(x1) = [1 3 0 3] x1 + [0]
[0 0 2 0] [1]
[0 0 1 2] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [1]
c(x1) = [1 3 3 3] x1 + [2]
[0 0 2 2] [1]
[0 0 1 2] [1]
[0 0 0 0] [1]
g(x1) = [1 3 3 2] x1 + [1]
[0 0 2 2] [1]
[0 0 1 2] [1]
[0 0 0 0] [1]
f(x1) = [1 3 3 2] x1 + [2]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
a(x1) = [1 0 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI2
stdout:
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(g(x1)) -> b(c(x1))
, g(x1) -> d(a(b(x1)))
, f(x1) -> a(g(x1))
, d(d(d(x1))) -> g(c(x1))
, d(d(x1)) -> c(f(x1))
, c(x1) -> g(x1)
, c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1)))
, b(b(x1)) -> c(d(x1))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..