Tool Bounds
Execution Time | 6.2235117e-2ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^1)) |
---|
Input | TCT 09 ma9 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(s(s(x))) -> f(x)
, g(s(0())) -> s(0())
, g(0()) -> s(0())
, f(s(x)) -> g(s(s(x)))
, f(0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 5.
The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
{ 0_0() -> 1
, 0_1() -> 2
, 0_2() -> 7
, 0_3() -> 10
, 0_4() -> 11
, 0_5() -> 12
, f_0(1) -> 1
, f_1(1) -> 1
, f_1(2) -> 1
, f_1(7) -> 1
, f_1(10) -> 1
, f_1(11) -> 1
, f_1(12) -> 1
, f_2(1) -> 1
, f_2(2) -> 1
, f_2(7) -> 1
, f_2(10) -> 1
, f_2(11) -> 1
, f_2(12) -> 1
, f_3(2) -> 1
, f_3(7) -> 1
, f_3(10) -> 1
, f_3(11) -> 1
, f_3(12) -> 1
, f_4(7) -> 1
, f_4(10) -> 1
, f_4(11) -> 1
, f_4(12) -> 1
, s_0(1) -> 1
, s_1(1) -> 4
, s_1(2) -> 1
, s_1(4) -> 3
, s_1(7) -> 1
, s_1(10) -> 1
, s_1(11) -> 1
, s_1(12) -> 1
, s_2(1) -> 5
, s_2(2) -> 6
, s_2(6) -> 5
, s_2(7) -> 1
, s_2(10) -> 1
, s_2(11) -> 1
, s_2(12) -> 1
, s_3(1) -> 8
, s_3(7) -> 9
, s_3(9) -> 8
, s_3(10) -> 1
, s_3(11) -> 1
, s_3(12) -> 1
, s_4(11) -> 1
, s_5(12) -> 1
, g_0(1) -> 1
, g_1(3) -> 1
, g_1(4) -> 1
, g_2(5) -> 1
, g_3(8) -> 1}
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool CDI
Execution Time | 1.3661199ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | TCT 09 ma9 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
QUADRATIC upper bound on the derivational complexity
This TRS is terminating using the deltarestricted interpretation
g(delta, X0) = + 1*X0 + 2 + 0*X0*delta + 1*delta
f(delta, X0) = + 0*X0 + 3 + 2*X0*delta + 2*delta
0(delta) = + 0 + 0*delta
s(delta, X0) = + 0*X0 + 1 + 2*X0*delta + 0*delta
g_tau_1(delta) = delta/(1 + 0 * delta)
f_tau_1(delta) = delta/(0 + 2 * delta)
s_tau_1(delta) = delta/(0 + 2 * delta)
Time: 1.328848 seconds
Statistics:
Number of monomials: 360
Last formula building started for bound 3
Last SAT solving started for bound 3Tool EDA
Execution Time | 0.4769261ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | TCT 09 ma9 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(s(s(x))) -> f(x)
, g(s(0())) -> s(0())
, g(0()) -> s(0())
, f(s(x)) -> g(s(s(x)))
, f(0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
0() = [0]
[2]
f(x1) = [1 3] x1 + [3]
[0 1] [3]
s(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [0]
[0 1] [1]
g(x1) = [1 2] x1 + [0]
[0 1] [2]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool IDA
Execution Time | 0.497715ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^2)) |
---|
Input | TCT 09 ma9 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(s(s(x))) -> f(x)
, g(s(0())) -> s(0())
, g(0()) -> s(0())
, f(s(x)) -> g(s(s(x)))
, f(0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(2)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
0() = [0]
[0]
f(x1) = [1 2] x1 + [2]
[0 0] [2]
s(x1) = [1 2] x1 + [0]
[0 0] [2]
g(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [1]
[0 0] [2]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI
Execution Time | 0.17298818ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^1)) |
---|
Input | TCT 09 ma9 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(s(s(x))) -> f(x)
, g(s(0())) -> s(0())
, g(0()) -> s(0())
, f(s(x)) -> g(s(s(x)))
, f(0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
0() = [2]
[0]
f(x1) = [1 2] x1 + [3]
[0 0] [1]
s(x1) = [1 2] x1 + [0]
[0 0] [1]
g(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [2]
[0 0] [1]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool TRI2
Execution Time | 0.14396381ms |
---|
Answer | YES(?,O(n^1)) |
---|
Input | TCT 09 ma9 |
---|
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ g(s(s(x))) -> f(x)
, g(s(0())) -> s(0())
, g(0()) -> s(0())
, f(s(x)) -> g(s(s(x)))
, f(0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
0() = [0]
[0]
f(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [2]
[0 0] [2]
s(x1) = [1 1] x1 + [0]
[0 0] [2]
g(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [1]
[0 0] [2]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))