Tool Bounds
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^1))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ a(a(x1)) -> a(c(b(a(x1))))
, b(x1) -> c(c(x1))
, b(c(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(b(x1))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 3.
The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
{ a_0(1) -> 1
, a_1(1) -> 4
, a_1(2) -> 1
, a_1(2) -> 4
, a_1(2) -> 8
, a_1(8) -> 7
, a_2(2) -> 11
, a_2(9) -> 4
, a_2(9) -> 7
, c_0(1) -> 1
, c_1(1) -> 5
, c_1(3) -> 2
, c_1(5) -> 1
, c_2(1) -> 12
, c_2(2) -> 12
, c_2(4) -> 6
, c_2(6) -> 3
, c_2(7) -> 13
, c_2(10) -> 9
, c_2(12) -> 8
, c_2(13) -> 2
, c_3(11) -> 14
, c_3(14) -> 10
, b_0(1) -> 1
, b_1(1) -> 8
, b_1(2) -> 8
, b_1(4) -> 3
, b_1(7) -> 2
, b_2(11) -> 10}
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))Tool CDI
stdout:
MAYBE
Statistics:
Number of monomials: 1445
Last formula building started for bound 3
Last SAT solving started for bound 3Tool EDA
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^3))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ a(a(x1)) -> a(c(b(a(x1))))
, b(x1) -> c(c(x1))
, b(c(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(b(x1))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^3))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a(x1) = [1 1 2] x1 + [0]
[0 0 1] [2]
[0 0 0] [0]
c(x1) = [1 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 0] [0]
[0 1 0] [0]
b(x1) = [1 0 2] x1 + [1]
[0 0 1] [0]
[0 0 0] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^3))Tool IDA
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^3))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ a(a(x1)) -> a(c(b(a(x1))))
, b(x1) -> c(c(x1))
, b(c(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(b(x1))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^3))
Proof:
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(3)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a(x1) = [1 3 1] x1 + [0]
[0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0] [2]
c(x1) = [1 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 1] [0]
[0 0 0] [0]
b(x1) = [1 2 0] x1 + [1]
[0 0 0] [0]
[0 1 0] [0]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^3))Tool TRI
stdout:
YES(?,O(n^2))
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ a(a(x1)) -> a(c(b(a(x1))))
, b(x1) -> c(c(x1))
, b(c(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(b(x1))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^2))
Proof:
We have the following triangular matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
a(x1) = [1 2 1 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 1 1] [2]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
c(x1) = [1 0 0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0 1 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [2]
b(x1) = [1 2 0 0] x1 + [1]
[0 0 0 0] [0]
[0 0 0 2] [0]
[0 0 0 0] [2]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^2))Tool TRI2
stdout:
MAYBE
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ a(a(x1)) -> a(c(b(a(x1))))
, b(x1) -> c(c(x1))
, b(c(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(b(x1))))}
StartTerms: all
Strategy: none
Certificate: MAYBE
Proof:
The input cannot be shown compatible
Arrrr..