WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) * Step 1: LocalSizeboundsProc WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B) -> f1(3000,B) True (1,1) 1. f1(A,B) -> f1(A,1000 + B) [889 + B >= 0 && 1999 >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,2);(f1,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1}] + Applied Processor: LocalSizeboundsProc + Details: LocalSizebounds generated; rvgraph (<0,0,A>, 3000, .= 3000) (<0,0,B>, B, .= 0) (<1,0,A>, A, .= 0) (<1,0,B>, 1000 + B, .+ 1000) * Step 2: SizeboundsProc WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B) -> f1(3000,B) True (1,1) 1. f1(A,B) -> f1(A,1000 + B) [889 + B >= 0 && 1999 >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,2);(f1,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1}] Sizebounds: (<0,0,A>, ?) (<0,0,B>, ?) (<1,0,A>, ?) (<1,0,B>, ?) + Applied Processor: SizeboundsProc + Details: Sizebounds computed: (<0,0,A>, 3000) (<0,0,B>, B) (<1,0,A>, 3000) (<1,0,B>, ?) * Step 3: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B) -> f1(3000,B) True (1,1) 1. f1(A,B) -> f1(A,1000 + B) [889 + B >= 0 && 1999 >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,2);(f1,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1}] Sizebounds: (<0,0,A>, 3000) (<0,0,B>, B) (<1,0,A>, 3000) (<1,0,B>, ?) + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,1)] * Step 4: UnreachableRules WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B) -> f1(3000,B) True (1,1) 1. f1(A,B) -> f1(A,1000 + B) [889 + B >= 0 && 1999 >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,2);(f1,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{},1->{1}] Sizebounds: (<0,0,A>, 3000) (<0,0,B>, B) (<1,0,A>, 3000) (<1,0,B>, ?) + Applied Processor: UnreachableRules + Details: The following transitions are not reachable from the starting states and are removed: [1] * Step 5: LeafRules WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B) -> f1(3000,B) True (1,1) Signature: {(f0,2);(f1,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{}] Sizebounds: (<0,0,A>, 3000) (<0,0,B>, B) + Applied Processor: LeafRules + Details: The problem is already solved. WORST_CASE(?,O(1))