WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) * Step 1: RestrictVarsProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B) -> f5(2,4) True (1,1) 1. f5(A,B) -> f5(2 + A,4 + A) [19 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A,B) -> f8(A,B) [A >= 20] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,2);(f5,2);(f8,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{}] + Applied Processor: RestrictVarsProcessor + Details: We removed the arguments [B] . * Step 2: LocalSizeboundsProc WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(2) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(2 + A) [19 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f8(A) [A >= 20] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,1);(f5,1);(f8,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{}] + Applied Processor: LocalSizeboundsProc + Details: LocalSizebounds generated; rvgraph (<0,0,A>, 2, .= 2) (<1,0,A>, 2 + A, .+ 2) (<2,0,A>, A, .= 0) * Step 3: SizeboundsProc WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(2) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(2 + A) [19 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f8(A) [A >= 20] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,1);(f5,1);(f8,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{}] Sizebounds: (<0,0,A>, ?) (<1,0,A>, ?) (<2,0,A>, ?) + Applied Processor: SizeboundsProc + Details: Sizebounds computed: (<0,0,A>, 2) (<1,0,A>, 21) (<2,0,A>, 21) * Step 4: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(2) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(2 + A) [19 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f8(A) [A >= 20] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,1);(f5,1);(f8,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{}] Sizebounds: (<0,0,A>, 2) (<1,0,A>, 21) (<2,0,A>, 21) + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,2)] * Step 5: LeafRules WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(2) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(2 + A) [19 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f8(A) [A >= 20] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,1);(f5,1);(f8,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2},2->{}] Sizebounds: (<0,0,A>, 2) (<1,0,A>, 21) (<2,0,A>, 21) + Applied Processor: LeafRules + Details: The following transitions are estimated by its predecessors and are removed [2] * Step 6: PolyRank WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(2) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(2 + A) [19 >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,1);(f5,1);(f8,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1}] Sizebounds: (<0,0,A>, 2) (<1,0,A>, 21) + Applied Processor: PolyRank {useFarkas = True, withSizebounds = [], shape = Linear} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of shape linear: p(f0) = 18 p(f5) = 20 + -1*x1 The following rules are strictly oriented: [19 >= A] ==> f5(A) = 20 + -1*A > 18 + -1*A = f5(2 + A) The following rules are weakly oriented: True ==> f0(A) = 18 >= 18 = f5(2) * Step 7: KnowledgePropagation WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(2) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(2 + A) [19 >= A] (18,1) Signature: {(f0,1);(f5,1);(f8,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1}] Sizebounds: (<0,0,A>, 2) (<1,0,A>, 21) + Applied Processor: KnowledgePropagation + Details: The problem is already solved. WORST_CASE(?,O(1))